pani pracuje na notebooku
12.08.2026 HR and Payroll outsourcing

How to account for employee benefits? A guide for employers 


Employee benefits can strengthen team engagement but incorrectly calculating them poses a real risk to the company. Find out when revenue is generated, how to correctly calculate personal income tax (PIT) and social security (ZUS) contributions, and how to avoid costly mistakes when applying for benefits from the Employee Benefits Fund (ZFŚS). 

Correct settlement of the benefit requires determining whether it constitutes the employee’s income, from what source it is financed and whether the regulations provide for exemption from personal income tax (PIT) or exclusion from the basis for social security contributions. 

How to properly account for employee benefits? 5 key rules 

Employee benefits are not just a tool for employer branding. They also entail specific responsibilities for HR, payroll, and finance departments, including determining whether an employee generates income, whether an advance payment should be made on their PIT (personal income tax) contributions, whether the benefit is subject to social security contributions, and how to properly document it.

The safest approach can be summarized in 5 steps: 

dentify the type of benefit – cash, in-kind, service, card, voucher, additional payment, benefit from the Employee Benefit Fund.

Determine the source of financing – employer’s current assets, Employee Benefits Fund, trade union fund, co-financing by the employee.

Check whether employee income is generated – not every benefit automatically constitutes taxable income.

Verify your PIT and ZUS separately – tax exemption does not always mean contribution exemption and vice versa. 

Take care of regulations, records and payroll data – errors most often occur not when selecting benefits, but when administering them. 

Why is correct benefit accounting crucial for employers?

The benefits market is maturing. Employers now offer not only private healthcare, sports cards, and group insurance, but also wellness programs, vacation subsidies, cafeteria platforms, psychological support, family benefits, courses, vouchers, prepaid cards, and benefits related to hybrid work. 

From an employee’s perspective, this is an attractive element of the offer. From an employer’s perspective, it is a process that requires precise management. Contract Administration points out that administering benefits can be time-consuming for companies, especially when it involves registering and deregistering employees, changing packages, collaborating with suppliers, and settling invoices. 

see also

How non-wage benefits affect employee well-being

Employee benefits and income: the starting point for correct settlement

The first question is not: “Is the benefit popular?” but: Does it generate income for the employee? 

The Social Insurance Institution (ZUS) indicates that, in the case of an employee, the basis for calculating contributions is generally their income from an employment contract, as defined by personal income tax regulations. The ZUS also confirms that benefits in kind, such as when a payer rents an apartment to an employee, can constitute income. 

In practice, this means that the employer should first determine whether a given benefit constitutes income from an employment relationship and then check whether there is a basis for exemption from personal income tax (PIT) or exclusion from the basis for social security contributions. 

The Constitutional Tribunal’s judgment of 8 July 2014, file reference K 7/13, is helpful here. The Tribunal indicated that other unpaid benefits can be considered employee income only if they represent a tangible financial gain of individually determined value, received by the employee. The announcement following the Constitutional Tribunal’s judgment also emphasized that the benefit must actually result in cost savings for the employee, and that the voluntary use of the benefit and whether it is in the employee’s best interest are also important. 

Practice Review Questions 

For each benefit, it is worth asking four questions: 

1. Did the employee use the benefit voluntarily?

For example, a voluntary sports or medical package is usually different from mandatory occupational health and safety training.

2. Is the benefit primarily in the employee’s best interests?

For example, private medical care for an employee most often provides a personal benefit, while a tool necessary to perform work primarily serves the employer.

3. Can a benefit be attributed to a specific employee?

If the benefit is publicly available, not individually quantifiable, and its value cannot be attributed to a specific person, the settlement may be different than for a named subscription.

4. Is the value of the benefit determinable?

The employer should have data that allows them to determine the value of the benefit per employee.

PIT and ZUS: two different systems that must not be mixed

A common mistake is to assume that because a benefit is tax-exempt, it is automatically exempt from social security contributions. This simplification can lead to arrears. 

In the case of contributions, the starting point is the principle that the basis for calculating employee contributions is income from an employment relationship, with exceptions provided for in the contribution regulations. The current consolidated text of the Contribution Regulation indicates that the basis for calculating contributions is income, within the meaning of personal income tax regulations, earned by employees from their employer under the employment relationship, taking into account certain exclusions. 

One of the most important exclusions in benefit practice is § 2, section 1, point 26 of the Contribution Regulation. It applies to material benefits arising from collective bargaining agreements, remuneration regulations, or remuneration provisions if they involve the right to purchase certain goods, items, or services at prices lower than retail prices, or the use of free or partially paid transport. 

What does this mean for benefit settlement?

If employers want to limit the contribution risk with partially paid benefits, they should take care of three elements:

The basis in internal regulations – e.g. remuneration regulations, collective agreement or other remuneration regulations. 

Real partial payment by the employee – the employee should actually participate in the cost. 

Correctly determining the value of the benefit – the difference between the retail price or value of the benefit and the employee’s payment must be ascertainable. 

Without these elements, the benefit may be treated as income subject to contributions. 

Benefits financed from current assets

Benefits financed from the employer’s current assets are most often accounted for as employee income, provided they meet the criteria for recognition as income. This applies to many medical plans, sports cards, insurance, and cafeteria benefits, among others. 

Example: employer-funded medical package

The employer finances the employee’s medical plan worth 120 PLN per month. The employee incurs no fee. The package is personal, voluntary, and assessable. Generally, its value should be treated as employee income, and then a check should be made to determine whether there is a specific basis for tax or contribution exemption. 

However, if the employee contributes to the package and the principles of partial payment result from the remuneration regulations, it is possible to apply a contribution exclusion for material benefits, provided that all requirements of the contribution regulations are met. 

Benefits from the Employee Benefits Fund: it is not enough to call the benefit “social”

The Company Social Benefits Fund (ZFŚS) operates under a separate logic. The obligation to establish a ZFŚS depends on factors such as the number of employees, the type of employer, and the employment status determined in accordance with the ZFŚS Act. 

The most important thing for employers is that benefits from the Employee Benefits Fund (ZFŚS) should be social in nature. This means that their award and amount should depend on the eligible individual’s personal, family, and financial circumstances. Granting identical benefits from the fund to all employees without assessing social criteria could undermine the validity of ZFŚS funding. 

PIT for benefits from the Company Social Benefits Fund

According to Article 21, Section 1, Item 67 of the Personal Income Tax Act, certain benefits in kind and in cash financed entirely by the Employee Benefits Fund (ZFŚS) or trade union funds, up to a limit of PLN 1,000 per year, are exempt from tax. Benefits in kind do not include vouchers, coupons, or other tokens that entitle them to exchange for goods or services. This means that when considering benefits from the ZFŚS, it is necessary to verify not only the amount but also the type of benefit and the source of financing. 

ZUS for benefits from the Company Social Benefits Fund

Benefits financed from funds earmarked for social purposes within the Employee Benefits Fund (ZFŚS) may be exempt from the contribution calculation basis, provided they are granted in accordance with the principles of social activity. In practice, the following are crucial: ZFŚS regulations, employee applications, social situation declarations, and documentation confirming the method of granting the benefit. 

The most common mistakes made by employers when settling benefits 

1. Lack of consistency between regulations and practice  
The regulations provide for partial payment or criteria for granting benefits, but in practice, benefits are granted equally to everyone. This is one of the most common reasons for disputed settlements. 

2. Transferring payroll data too late  
If information about a new employee joining, resigning, or changing their package reaches the payroll department after the roll call is closed, adjustments are made. With large-scale employment, benefit adjustments can become a constant, costly process. 

3. Combining different sources of financing without clear rules  
The benefit can be financed from working capital, from the Employee Benefits Fund, partially by the employee, or through a mixed model. Each option requires a different tax and contribution approach. 

4. Treating vouchers as benefits in kind   
In the case of tax exemption for benefits from the Employee Benefits Fund, it is important that vouchers, coupons and similar exchangeable tokens are not treated as benefits in kind within the meaning of Article 21 paragraph 1 item 67 of the Personal Income Tax Act. 

5. No individual records of benefits   
The employer should know who benefits from the benefit, from when, to what extent, what the value of the benefit is, what part was financed by the employee and what amount was included in the payroll. 

How to build a secure benefits management process? 

Correct settlement of benefits requires cooperation between several areas: HR, payroll, finance, taxes, benefit providers and – in the case of the Social Fund – the persons responsible for the social fund. 

A process based on a clear flow of information works best: 

1. Benefit Design  
At this stage, it is necessary to determine who the benefit is for, who finances it, whether the employee participates in the costs, whether the benefit requires regulations, and how it will be priced. 

2. Documentation  
It is worth preparing or updating remuneration regulations, benefits regulations, Employee Benefits Fund regulations, application forms, declarations and consents. 

3. Participant administration  
Ensure an efficient process for registration, cancellation, package changes, adding family members and reporting changes to payroll. 

4. Payroll data  
Payroll should receive data on a fixed date, in an agreed format and with clear indication: value of the benefit, employee’s remuneration, source of financing, validity period. 

5. Control and audit  
It is worth periodically checking whether benefits are settled in accordance with regulations, invoices, supplier data and current regulations. 

This approach fits well with the broader trend of professionalizing HR and payroll processes. Contract Administration emphasizes that modern HR and payroll outsourcing encompasses not only payroll calculations but also employee documentation, time tracking, social security contributions, personal income tax returns, and audit support. 

Table: How to initially assess popular benefits?

Type of benefit The most important question Typical risks 
Private medical care Is the package personal and financed by the employer? Failure to recognize income or incorrect application of the contribution exclusion 
Sports card Does the employee partially finance the benefit and is this specified in the regulations? Contribution of the difference if the exclusion conditions are not met 
Group insurance Who finances the contribution and does the employee have an individual benefit? Incorrect determination of the value of income 
Co-financing of holidays from the Company Social Benefits Fund Were the social criteria and PIT limit applied? Giving everyone the same amount without analysing the social situation 
Vouchers and coupons Can the benefit from tax exemption? Incorrect treatment of vouchers as benefits in kind 
Cafeteria Platform How are points valued and when is revenue generated? Lack of consistency between benefit selection, invoice and payroll 
Benefits for family members Should the benefit be attributed to the employee? Omitting the value of the benefit of a companion or child 

FAQ – questions most frequently asked by employers 

Is every employee benefit taxable? 

Is a benefit exempt from PIT automatically exempt from ZUS? 

Can a sports card be exempt from ZUS contributions? 

Are benefits from the Social Benefits Fund always tax-free? 

Do Social Benefits Fund vouchers enjoy tax exemption like benefits in kind? 

How to reduce the risk of errors with benefits? 

Summary

Employee benefits can strengthen engagement, retention, and employer branding, but only if they are well-designed and properly accounted for. The greatest risks lie not in the selection of benefits themselves, but also in their qualification, documentation, recordkeeping, and data flow between HR, vendors, and the payroll department. 

The employer should remember that: 

  • a benefit may constitute income for an employee if it gives him a real and individual benefit, 
  • PIT and ZUS require separate analysis, 
  • benefits from the Social Fund must be granted in accordance with the social criteria, 
  • the employee’s partial payment should result from the relevant internal regulations, 
  • lack of records and timely reporting may lead to payroll corrections and risks during audits. 

Want to reduce the risk of errors in benefits settlement and relieve your HR team of time-consuming administration? Discover how Contract Administration can handle benefits management at your company, from applications and employee registration, through supplier contact, to the data needed for accurate benefit settlement. Discover the service: Benefits Management – Contract Administration 

If you need a comprehensive look at the employer’s obligations in the area of HR and payroll, as well as practical tips on how to properly implement them, reach for the HR and Payroll Guide for Employers 


Monika Roman Director of Human Resources, Contract Administration She has many years of experience in outsourcing and, since 2008, has been responsible for managing the personnel administration department, providing services to over 150 Polish and international clients. An expert in labor law.
Magdalena Kośmider-Sysik Director of Payroll Department - Contract Administration, Warsaw An expert with over 25 years’ experience in payroll administration and business process outsourcing. She manages a department serving over 350 clients, and her experience covers projects for national and international organisations, including process optimisation, audits and the implementation of modern technological solutions supporting HR and payroll.

Discover our services

Want to stay up to date?
Subscribe to our newsletter!

Full version

Contract Administration Sp. z o. o.

Wronia 10
00-840 Warsaw
Poland

Office reception: +48 22 295 32 00

contact@ca-staff.eu

NIP: 526-001-29-88, KRS: 0000028831,
REGON: 012548510. The District Court for the
capital city of Warsaw, XIII Commercial Division

Mapa